Differences between revisions 18 and 19
Revision 18 as of 2017-07-27 07:50:41
Size: 3259
Comment:
Revision 19 as of 2017-07-27 07:51:08
Size: 3265
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 27: Line 27:
Issues with simulations (to be addressed in the future): '''Issues with simulations (to be addressed in the future):'''

Description of performance tests and simulations relevant to the APETOOL and SHAPELIB libraries.

Simulations are underway to test the following aspects relevant to apetool and shapelib:

  1. How well/accurate can the shapelet-PSF model determine the flux of point-sources: simulate fields (both survey-mode and pointed) with a grid of point sources of fixed flux and spectral. Run ermldetect to detect the sources and measure their flux and compare with the input one.
  2. How well can APETOOL reconstruct the selection function of eROSITA observations: simulate fields (both survey-mode and pointed) with a point-sources with fluxes drawn from a logN-logS distribution and fixed spectral shape. Run ERLDETECT and ptoduce a source list, APETOOL to threshold at a given false detection probability and estimate field sensitivities. Reconstruct input logN-logS and compare.

The relevant simulations are based on modified versions of Nicolas Clerc's python scripts described here. The main modifications are: (i) functions to generate attitude files for both survey and pointed observations (ii) place sources in a grid of fixed spacing within the survey field, (iii) use of simple power-law X-ray spectra with a choice of Gammas for the point sources, (iv) functionality to produce sources of fixed flux. A tarball with the relevant python scripts can be found [[|here(to be added soon)]].

Progress so far

Simulations of sources with flux f_X(0.5-2)=2e-12cgs in grid. Pointed observations and survey fields have been simulated. The latter use the attitude file: oneyearsurvey_att.fits. Sixte and Simput versions 2.2.0 have been used. The EROSIM task with the XML files and the Panter PSF (256M!) was run followed by the ERO_CALEVENTS task.

The table below lists links to the input simput file, the event files for each telescope separately and the merged one (via call to evtool):

simput_test.fits

simput file

ccd1_new_events.fits

Event file for CCD1

ccd2_new_events.fits

Event file for CCD2

ccd3_new_events.fits

Event file for CCD3

ccd4_new_events.fits

Event file for CCD4

ccd5_new_events.fits

Event file for CCD5

ccd6_new_events.fits

Event file for CCD6

ccd7_new_events.fits

Event file for CCD7

sm04_183156_020_EventList_001_t001.fits

Merged Event file

Issues with simulations (to be addressed in the future):

  • the event files produced by ERO_CALEVENTS have columns RA and DEC of type 'J' (integer) in the 'EVENTS' extension. Should be 'E' or 'D'
  • the event files produced by EROSIM include events with negative energies.

EROSITAwiki: EroCat/eSASSdevel/APETOOL (last edited 2017-07-27 10:43:22 by AntonisGeorgakakis)