Differences between revisions 1 and 2
Revision 1 as of 2018-03-09 15:20:07
Size: 1252
Editor: TomDwelly
Comment:
Revision 2 as of 2018-03-09 15:23:03
Size: 1468
Editor: TomDwelly
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 13: Line 13:
  * this contains a list of vignetting values evaluated at 3 energies and 31 offaxis angles   * this contains a list of vignetting values evaluated at 3 energy bands and 31 offaxis angles
   * it is not clear what mean energy should be assumed for each energy band.
Line 15: Line 16:
  * A pseudo-Moffat distribution is found to give a reasonable match to the data: vign(oa) = [1 + (oa/theta0)**alpha]**beta   * A pseudo-Moffat distribution is found to give a reasonable match to the tabulated values, i.e. vign(oa) = [1 + (oa/theta0)**alpha]**beta
Line 17: Line 18:
  * This quadratic form is probably bad at energies above the upper tabulated energy band
Line 18: Line 20:
 * The parameters describing the  * The parameters describing this fit are as follows:

Modelling the vignetting function of eROSITA

This is a holding page to gather together notes on produsing an analytic vignetting model for eSASS tasks

Problem: The current method to represent the eROSITA vignetting function in the eSASS required interpolation from a tabulated grid of calibration measurements, this is computationally awkward, and can lead to discontinuities in the derived system response. Desired improvement: Compute an analytic description of the vignetting function of each eROSITA telescope module, and save the parameters of this model into the CALDB

First step

  • Start from the vignetting description file supplied with the current version of SIXTE (share/sixte/instruments/srg/erosita_vignetting_v2.1.fits)
    • this contains a list of vignetting values evaluated at 3 energy bands and 31 offaxis angles
      • it is not clear what mean energy should be assumed for each energy band.
  • For each energy value we fit a simple model as a function of off-axis angle
    • A pseudo-Moffat distribution is found to give a reasonable match to the tabulated values, i.e. vign(oa) = [1 + (oa/theta0)**alpha]**beta
  • The values of theta0,beta,alpha are then interpolated using a quadratic expression to allow evaluation of the expression at any energy
    • This quadratic form is probably bad at energies above the upper tabulated energy band
  • The parameters describing this fit are as follows:

EROSITAwiki: EroCat/AnalyticVignetting (last edited 2020-06-11 14:45:06 by JeremySanders)