Differences between revisions 1 and 2
Revision 1 as of 2012-07-11 11:19:34
Size: 1319
Comment:
Revision 2 as of 2012-07-11 11:25:33
Size: 1594
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 4: Line 4:
different persons), who suggested a particular catalog for inclusion in the tool, agreed to provide and maintain the catalog, or agreed to supply a correlation table which cross-matching the catalog with the eROSITA sources. Note that there may be several correlation tables for each catalog, which may have been computed using different algorithms or with different science objectives in mind. The current status of the discussion seems to indicate that is best if the different science working groups will be responsible for providing the correlation tables for their science area. In the interest of a smooth flow of information, it probably would be best if the persons creating the correlation tables were also members of the eROcat and follow-up WG in addition to their respective science WG. The details of the prodedures for filling the catalog tool with catalogs are still under discussion, e.g., at the Hamburg consortium different persons), who suggested a particular catalog for inclusion in the tool, agreed to provide and maintain the catalog, or agreed to supply a correlation table which cross-matching the catalog with the eROSITA sources. Note that there may be several correlation tables for each catalog, which may have been computed using different algorithms or with different science objectives in mind. The current status of the discussion seems to indicate that is best if the different science working groups will be responsible for providing the correlation tables for their science area. In the interest of a smooth flow of information, it probably would be best if the persons creating the correlation tables were also members of the eROcat and follow-up WG in addition to their respective science WG. The details of the procedures for filling the catalog tool with catalogs are still under discussion, e.g., at the Hamburg consortium
Line 6: Line 6:

|| '''Catalog''' || '''proposed by''' || '''provided and maintained by''' || '''correlation tables provided by''' 1) || '''Remarks''' ||






1) several correlation tables may be provided; please include the name of the science WG, supplying the correlation table

Catalogs and catalog maintainers for the eROSITA catalogs and data products access tool

This page lists all the catalogs intended for inclusion in the eROSITA catalogs and data products access tool. For each catalog, the table below lists three persons (not necessarily three different persons), who suggested a particular catalog for inclusion in the tool, agreed to provide and maintain the catalog, or agreed to supply a correlation table which cross-matching the catalog with the eROSITA sources. Note that there may be several correlation tables for each catalog, which may have been computed using different algorithms or with different science objectives in mind. The current status of the discussion seems to indicate that is best if the different science working groups will be responsible for providing the correlation tables for their science area. In the interest of a smooth flow of information, it probably would be best if the persons creating the correlation tables were also members of the eROcat and follow-up WG in addition to their respective science WG. The details of the procedures for filling the catalog tool with catalogs are still under discussion, e.g., at the Hamburg consortium meeting or through the erocat mailing list. Comments on this page are also welcome.

Catalog

proposed by

provided and maintained by

correlation tables provided by 1)

Remarks

1) several correlation tables may be provided; please include the name of the science WG, supplying the correlation table

EROSITAwiki: Catalogs and their maintainers (last edited 2013-07-15 07:40:31 by RobertSuhada)